Saturday, March 9, 2019

Robes and Reality


3/9/19
Think Neither Good Nor Evil plants us right in the middle way. What has that to do with a robe a bowl, a barely literate man running into the mountains and encountering a former military man who wants to take what you have? This sounds like a plot to some cheesy novel about truth and faith in the fields of a foreign country. But what if it was all perverted and the robber was not “an originally honest and good-hearted straightforward man?” Suppose he wasn’t any of that and just took the robe?  What version might we be reading?  What does “think neither good nor evil" have to do with this?’ The story would have moved from the truth to a lie. Continuity would be disrupted. That robe represented more than the physicality of truth and faith.
Trump stole the robe. Now he is sweating in a massive perversion of faith, truth or as we call it, dharma.
As I tried to write I remembered a book called The Robe.    It is in Christian context but here is the synopsis from Wiki.
The book explores the aftermath of the crucifixion of Jesus through the experiences of the Roman tribune, Marcellus Gallio and his Greek slave Demetrius. Prince Gaius, in an effort to rid Rome of Marcellus, banishes Marcellus to the command of the Roman garrison at Minoa, a port city in southern Palestine. In Jerusalem during Passover, Marcellus ends up carrying out the crucifixion of Jesus but is troubled since he believes Jesus is innocent of any crime.          
Marcellus and some other soldiers throw dice to see who will take Jesus' seamless robe. Marcellus wins and asks Demetrius to take care of the robe.
Following the crucifixion, Marcellus takes part in a banquet attended by Pontius Pilate. During the banquet, a drunken centurion insists that Marcellus wear Jesus' robe. Reluctantly wearing the garment, Marcellus apparently suffers a nervous breakdown and returns to Rome.
Sent to Athens to recuperate, Marcellus finally gives in to Demetrius' urging and touches the robe, and his mind is subsequently restored. Marcellus, now believing the robe has some sort of innate power, returns to Judea, follows the path Jesus took, and meets many people whose lives Jesus had affected. Based upon their experiences first Demetrius and then Marcellus becomes a follower of Jesus.
Marcellus then returns to Rome, where he must report his experiences to the emperor, Tiberius at Villa Jovis on Capri. Marcellus frees Demetrius, who escapes. However, later on, because of his uncompromising stance regarding his Christian faith, both Marcellus and his new wife Diana are executed by the new emperor, Caligula. Marcellus arranges that the robe be given to "The Big Fisherman" (Simon Peter).
Robes have physical presence, significance and represent the intangible, untouchable in our experience. We exist and the valence is neither good nor evil but what we do with and how we manifest our faith in self and other. Take the robe, do not take it, touch or not, steal or not, give freely or not. Consequences of conscious will pursue us and the choices we make. I would say that after reading some of Ryokan’s poetry he would attest to that.


Sunday, March 3, 2019

William Stafford, Ryokan, Think Neither Good Nor Evil


3/3/19
These words crossed my mind today as I was meditating. “I don’t have to prove anything.”  A few minutes later, I was startled enough to gasp out loud and sink down into my cushion to hear a Buddhist teacher read very similar words that were among the last ones the poet William Stafford wrote. We have also been studying the Zen poetry of a wandering itinerant monk calligrahper named Ryokan.  And at the same time, we are studying Koan number 23 of the Gateless Barrier called Think Neither Good Nor Evil.  Buddhists seem to study a lot which could be a run off from sitting meditation. The words, thoughts, emotions, actions etc., just flow out in various forms.
In brief informal discussion after the sit and class, I said “both Stafford and Ryokan were conscientious objectors”.  Stafford to WW2 and Ryokan to the temple society of his time 1758-1831. Both would become revered poets. Without thinking either good or evil they both knew their true selves existed and went their way.